Forensic Audit Model Based on Benford’s Law and Anomaly Detection Algorithms in Corporate Expense Reports
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/jiafc.v1i2.208Keywords:
Anomaly Detection, Benford’s Law, Financial Fraud, Forensic Audit, Hybrid ModelAbstract
Corporate expense reports are often vulnerable to fraudulent practices such as fictitious entries, inflated costs, and data manipulation, which can undermine the reliability of financial statements and damage stakeholder trust. Traditional auditing methods, while essential, face limitations in handling large-scale data and in identifying complex patterns of fraud. This research aims to address these challenges by developing a forensic audit model that integrates Benford’s Law with anomaly detection algorithms to improve the accuracy of fraud detection. The study employed anonymized corporate expense report records containing numerical, categorical, and textual attributes. Data preprocessing involved cleaning, normalization, and feature extraction, followed by applying Benford’s Law to identify abnormal digit distributions. Machine learning algorithms, including Isolation Forest, Local Outlier Factor (LOF), and DBSCAN, were then used to detect anomalies in transaction data. The findings indicate that the hybrid model combining these methods achieved superior results with an accuracy of 93.4% and an F1-score of 90.4%, outperforming standalone approaches and significantly reducing false positives and false negatives. This suggests that integrating statistical and machine learning techniques enhances the reliability and efficiency of forensic auditing in detecting suspicious financial activities. The study concludes that such a hybrid framework provides a more comprehensive fraud detection system, offering practical benefits for corporate internal control and regulatory oversight, as well as theoretical contributions to the advancement of data-driven forensic auditing.
References
Aleksandrova, E. B., Lavrova, D. S., & Yarmak, A. V. (2019). Benford’s law in the detection of DoS attacks on industrial systems. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 53(8), 954–962. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411619080030
Arezzo, M. F., & Cerqueti, R. (2023). A Benford’s Law view of inspections’ reasonability. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 632, 129294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129294
B. Kavus, & Soleimani-Zakeri, N. S. (2024). Forecasting fraud detection using data science methods. Eurasia Proceedings of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 31, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55549/epstem.1591554
Bakumenko, A., & Elragal, A. (2022). Detecting anomalies in financial data using machine learning algorithms. Systems, 10(5), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050130
Belgaum, M. R., et al. (2025). Comparative analysis of detecting anomalies in real-time streaming data. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1264, 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2179-8_37
Boritz, J. E., Kochetova-Kozloski, N., & Robinson, L. (2015). Are fraud specialists relatively more effective than auditors at modifying audit programs in the presence of fraud risk? Accounting Review, 90(3), 881–915. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50911
Carletti, M., Terzi, M., & Susto, G. A. (2023). Interpretable anomaly detection with DIFFI: Depth-based feature importance of Isolation Forest. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 119, 105730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105730
Chimonaki, C., Papadakis, S., Vergos, K., & Shahgholian, A. (2019). Identification of financial statement fraud in Greece by using computational intelligence techniques. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 345, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19037-8_3
Darrab, S., et al. (2024). Anomaly detection algorithms: Comparative analysis and explainability perspectives. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1943, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8696-5_7
Davydov, D., & Swidler, S. (2016). Assessing the quality of bank financial statements with the Benford distribution. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 19(4), 1650021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091516500211
Dumičić, K., & Mataković, I. C. (2019). Challenges of Benford's law goodness-of-fit testing in discovering the distribution of first digits: Comparison of two industries. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Operational Research (SOR) (pp. 290–295).
Erazo Portilla, C. M., et al. (2024). Forensic audit and its impact on public organizations in Ecuador. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 30(Especial 9), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v30i.42279
Erazo Portilla, C. M., et al. (2024). Forensic audit and its impact… Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 30(9), 410–421.
Goyal, Y., & Kumar, P. (2024). Financial advisory systems as a tool for audit efficiency: A comparison of forensic and statutory auditing techniques. In Robo-Advisors in Management (pp. 313–327). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2849-1.ch021
Gupta, M., Aggarwal, P. K., & Gupta, R. (2024). Revitalizing forensic accounting: An exploratory study on mitigating financial risk using data analytics. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 41, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2024.v41spl.019
Handoko, B. L., Rosita, A., Ayuanda, N., & Budiarto, A. Y. (2022). The impact of big data analytics and forensic audit in fraud detection. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering (WCSE) (pp. 67–71). https://doi.org/10.18178/wcse.2022.06.011
Johari, R. J., Ibrahim, I., & Hussin, S. A. H. S. (2021). Creating auditable environment: An approach towards eliminating fraud opportunities. In Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance and Fraud (pp. 87–103). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6636-7_4
Lehenchuk, S., Valinkevych, N., Hrytsak, O., & Vyhivska, I. (2022). The Beneish model as a tool for detecting falsification of financial statements and a tool for economic security of the enterprise: Ukrainian experience. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2413, 040009. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0079051
Lyu, Z., & Pan, Z. (2022). HAD-IDC: A hybrid framework for data anomaly detection based on isolation, density, and clustering. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT). https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIT55038.2022.9848201
Maming, N., Chaimontree, S., & Lim, A. (2024). Loan applicant anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) (pp. 469–474). https://doi.org/10.1109/JCSSE61278.2024.10613664
Namaplli, R. C. R., Kleckova, E., Singh, K., Vyas, N., Karnawat, A. T., & Pran, S. G. (2024). Predicting financial statement fraud with deep Q-network (DQN) model: A machine learning approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Research in Computational Science (ICERCS 2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICERCS63125.2024.10895234
Odia, J. O., & Akpata, O. T. (2020). Role of data science and data analytics in forensic accounting and fraud detection. In Handbook of Research on Engineering, Business, and Healthcare Applications of Data Science and Analytics (pp. 203–227). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3053-5.ch011
Othman, R., Ameer, R., & Laswad, F. (2019). Forensic auditing tools in detecting financial statements’ irregularities: Benford's law and Beneish model in the case of Toshiba. In Organizational Auditing and Assurance in the Digital Age (pp. 256–275). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7356-2.ch013
Pavlović, V., et al. (2019). Fraud detection in financial statements applying Benford’s law with Monte Carlo simulation. Acta Oeconomica, 69(2), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2019.69.2.4
Romero-Carazas, R., et al. (2024). Forensic auditing and AI. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 415–428.
Romero-Carazas, R., et al. (2024). Forensic auditing and the use of artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review in Scopus between 2000 and 2024. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v6i2.626
Sastroredjo, P. E. (2025). Benford’s law analysis on tax irregularities in banking and investment activities. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 14(2), 674–686.
Shalhoob, H., Halawani, B., Alharbi, M., & Babiker, I. (2024). The impact of big data analytics on the detection of errors and fraud in accounting processes. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(1), e06115. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n1-121
Viji, D., Triapthi, S. M., & Asawa, V. (2019). A survey on data mining techniques used for credit card fraud detection. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(4), 1034–1038.
Vona, L. W. (2016). Fraud data analytics methodology: The fraud scenario approach to uncovering fraud in core business systems. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119270331
Witayanont, Y., & Viyanon, W. (2025). Anomaly detection in Bitcoin network using distance-based and tree-based unsupervised learning methods. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Blockchain and Secure Critical Infrastructure (BSCI). https://doi.org/10.1145/3659463.3660022
Yahia, A., et al. (2024). Leveraging machine learning for anomaly detection in cryptocurrency. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Optimization and Applications (ICOA). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOA62581.2024.10754457
Yang, P. (2025). Research on the construction of enterprise financial fraud identification model under data mining technology. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Internet and Digital Economy (ICAID) (pp. 51–54). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAID65275.2025.11034554
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Investigative Auditing & Financial Crime

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


