The Role of Profitability, Leverage and Ineffective Monitoring in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/jiafc.v1i2.159Keywords:
Fraud Hexagon Theory, Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Ineffective Monitoring, Leverage, ProfitabilityAbstract
This study aims to examine the potential for fraudulent financial reporting by applying the fraud hexagon theory framework, focusing on three main determinants: profitability, leverage, and ineffective monitoring. The research population includes healthcare sector manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2019–2023, with the sample selected using purposive sampling techniques, resulting in 20 eligible companies that met the specified criteria. The analysis employed time series regression using EViews 12 as the primary statistical tool to test the hypotheses. The findings indicate that profitability has a negative effect on the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting, suggesting that firms with stronger financial performance are less likely to manipulate their reports. In contrast, leverage and ineffective monitoring both exhibit positive and significant effects, meaning that companies with higher debt burdens and weaker supervisory mechanisms face greater risks of engaging in financial fraud. These results highlight that while profitability can act as a safeguard against fraudulent practices, excessive leverage and insufficient oversight create strong incentives and opportunities for manipulation. The implications of this study are twofold: for corporate management, it emphasizes the importance of maintaining financial health and strengthening monitoring mechanisms to reduce the risk of fraud; for regulators and auditors, it suggests closer scrutiny of highly leveraged firms and those with weak governance structures. Overall, the research contributes empirical evidence to the understanding of fraud risk factors within the healthcare manufacturing sector in Indonesia and underscores the necessity of integrating profitability, leverage, and monitoring considerations in developing fraud prevention frameworks. By doing so, companies and regulators can enhance transparency, accountability, and investor confidence in financial reporting practices.
References
Adelia, R., Santoso, A., & Lestari, I. (2023). The influence of profitability and leverage against fraud report finance in manufacturing companies. Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 18(1), 44–55.
Aji, A. R., & Sari, R. P. (2024). The role of ineffective monitoring in detecting indication fraud financial reporting: An empirical study of public companies. Journal of Scientific Economics and Business, 29(2), 121–133.
Christian, E., & Visakha, C. (2021). The influence of corporate governance on fraudulent financial reporting in manufacturing companies. Journal of Accounting Science, 7(1), 76–88.
Claudia, V., & Dewi, R. (2023). The effect of leverage and ownership structure on fraudulent financial reporting. Indonesian Journal of Economics and Business, 14(2), 88–96.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Erawati, M. M., & Tunnajiha, S. (2023). Leverage and earnings quality in agency theory perspective. Journal of Finance and Banking, 27(1), 77–89.
Fitri, N., & Sulistyowati, E. (2023). Analysis of the influence of leverage, profitability, and institutional ownership on fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 24(2), 203–215.
Georgios, L. V. (2019). The fraud hexagon: A new model for understanding fraud. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 7(3), 61–73.
Habibie, M., & Parasetya, A. (2022). Pressure profitability and earnings management: An empirical study of public companies. Journal of Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(1), 42–52.
Hariana, A. (2022). The influence of ineffective monitoring on the occurrence of financial report fraud. Journal of Scientific Accounting and Finance, 20(1), 12–21.
Mayabi, D. A., & Meriyani, N. (2023). Profitability and financial reporting fraud in the banking sector in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Finance and Banking, 8(1), 55–68.
Milasari, N., & Ratmono, D. (2019). The influence of leverage and supervision against financial report fraud. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 20(2), 109–120.
Putri, A., Wardani, R., & Kartika, D. (2023). The influence of profitability against fraudulent financial reporting with ownership structure as moderating variables. Journal of Business Accounting, 15(1), 23–34.
Putri, R. F., & Qintharah, A. (2023). The effect of ineffective monitoring on fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Regional Accounting and Finance, 12(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.33558/jrak.v14i1.6924
Salim, A., & Riady, M. (2021). Influence of profitability, liquidity, and leverage against fraud financial reporting: An empirical study of manufacturing companies. Journal of Accounting, 25(1), 43–55.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Tesfaye, G. A., Alemayehu, A. Y., & Yimam, A. Y. (2025). The role of forensic accounting in detecting financial fraud in complex corporate structures. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 15(1), 14–29.
Widyanti, A. D., & Nuryatno, M. (2019). The influence of profitability to fraud report finance in public companies on the IDX. Journal of Scientific Accounting and Investment, 3(2), 132–143.
